Cybercriminals use fake search engines to spread malware

June 15, 2009

Cybercriminals have moved on from search engine optimization techniques and are now creating fake search sites designed solely to direct Web surfers to pages hosting malware, Panda Security warned on Wednesday.

Previously, attackers resorted to sending e-mails with malicious code in attachments and with links to malicious Web sites and took measures to push those Web sites higher in search engine rankings. Now, they're also creating fake search engines that are showing up in Google search results, according to a PandaLabs blog posting.

When people use the engines to search for popular terms, like "flu statistics," the results displayed redirect to porn sites that purport to show video but require the visitor to install what they say is the latest version of a video player but which instead is malware, the post said. Searching on the fake search engines for security topics leads to fake antivirus sites, PandaLabs said.

One of the fake search engines has received about 195,000 visits, according to the post.

Web surfers should use reputable search sites to protect themselves, PandaLabs recommends.

This screenshot shows results on a fake search engine that redirects visitors to sites hosting malware, according to PandaLabs.


 

McAfee blasted for having holes in its Web sites

June 15, 2009

Security researcher Mike Bailey released this screen shot showing that he gained access to McAfee Secure via a cross-site request forgery hole.

Security vulnerabilities on McAfee sites, including one designed to scan customers' sites for flaws, exposed certain customer accounts and could have been used for phishing attacks in which malware disguised as McAfee software could be distributed, security experts say.

McAfee said late on Tuesday that most of the vulnerabilities were fixed, except for one part of the Web site that was taken offline to be fixed.

The McAfee sites were found to be vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks and cross-site request forgery attacks that could lead to phishing attacks on customers who think they are visiting the security vendor's site, according to an article on ReadWriteWeb.

Ironically, one of the vulnerable sites was McAfee Secure, which scans customer sites to determine if they are vulnerable to such attacks. The problem would signal that either McAfee doesn't run McAfee Secure across all of its own sites or the product doesn't work well, the report said.

To fall victim to a cross-site request forgery attack on that site, targets would have to be logged into their McAfee accounts and browse to a malicious Web site that exploits the vulnerability, according to the Risky.biz site.

Such attacks on sites of antivirus vendors are particularly dangerous because they enable attackers to create fake versions of security products that install Trojans or other malware and customers will trust it, Lance James, co-founder of Secure Science Corporation, told ReadWriteWeb.

The hole on the McAfee Secure site would indicate that the company failed to comply with PCI requirements for Approved Scanning Vendors, didn't use a secure software development lifecycle in building the application, and neglected to do an in-depth penetration test of the site, security researcher Mike Bailey wrote on his Skeptikal.org blog on Monday.

McAfee spokesman Joris Evers said the site taken offline was the McAfee Knowledge Center, which is part of its customer support site that uses software from a third-party provider. The site had a cross-site scripting vulnerability, he said.

"These types of vulnerabilities are rarely exploited in the wild and thus aren't deemed to be severe," he said in an e-mail. None of the vulnerabilities exposed any McAfee corporate information and the company had not seen any malicious exploitation of the vulnerabilities, he added.

"McAfee has strict policies in place for its own Web sites and for services provided by third parties," Evers said. "We are investigating how these particular vulnerabilities were not identified in our screening process and will adjust our processes if necessary."

McAfee isn't the only security company to have security problems on its site. Last month, The Register reported on a cross-site scripting vulnerability on Symantec's site. And in February, a Romanian hacker site claimed to have used cross-site scripting and SQL injection attacks to breach the sites of F-Secure, Kaspersky, and BitDefender.

 

Feds' red tape left medical devices infected with computer virus

June 15, 2009

The Conficker Internet virus has infected important computerized medical devices, but governmental red tape interfered with their repair, an organizer of an antivirus working group told Congress on Friday.

Rodney Joffe, one of the founders of an unofficial organization known as the Conficker Working Group, said that government regulations prevented hospital staff from carrying out the repairs.

Joffe, who also is the senior vice president for the telecom clearinghouse Neustar, told a panel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee that over the last three weeks, he and another Conficker researcher identified at least 300 critical medical devices from a single manufacturer that have been infected with the computer virus.

The devices were used in hospitals to allow doctors to view and manipulate high-intensity scans like MRIs and were often found in or near intensive care unit facilities, connected to local area networks with other critical medical devices.

"They should have never, ever been connected to the Internet," Joffe said.

Regulatory requirements mandated that the impacted hospitals would have to wait 90 days before the systems could be modified to remove the infections and vulnerabilities.

Joffe's testimony and earlier reports of infected medical devices show the risks involved in efforts to reap the economic benefits of a networked world. President Obama's stimulus package has allocated billions of dollars for digitizing medical records and networking the nation's electric grids.

"The open Internet, one of its great values is it allows you to connect fairly cheaply and fairly easily to other computers," Joffe said. He added, however, that "the Internet was never designed to do the things it's doing today."

That includes connecting control systems to the Internet to manipulate and coordinate the nation's electric grids.

"The future of widespread (electric) meter-to-meter communication does have me concerned," said Dan Kaminsky, a technology consultant who last year discovered a critical flaw in the Internet's core infrastructure. "I would like to see more security for those meters."

It was recently reported that Chinese and Russian spies had infiltrated the grid networks. Politicians introduced a bill on Thursday to give the Homeland Security Department and other federal agencies more authority over utilities in order to protect the "smart" grid from cyberattacks.

Joffe and other witnesses said that, at an operational level, the DHS is the appropriate government agency to improve cybersecurity. He called the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, which is operated by the DHS, "woefully understaffed and woefully underfunded." As part of its mission, USCERT acts as a liaison between the public and private sectors.

Gregory Nojeim, senior counsel for the Center for Democracy and Technology, also said DHS should naturally hold jurisdiction over cybersecurity, as long as it makes its actions more transparent and receives policy guidance from the White House.

Policymakers need to be clear and open in their work with the private sector, Nojeim said, and should avoid giving anyone in the government--even the president--too much power over private networks. He urged the congressional panel to reject legislation from Senator Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., that would give the president power to shut down any critical network--federal or otherwise--in an emergency.

"Any such shutdown could also have far-reaching, unintended consequences for the economy and for the critical infrastructures themselves," he said. "To our knowledge, no circumstance has yet arisen that could justify a presidential order to limit or cut off Internet traffic to a particular critical infrastructure syst
 



Best Communitation Website
Which communication website is best?

Myspace
Facebook
Twitter
Furry-paws
Youtube


Make a free website with Yola